Saturday, July 7, 2007

Choose your weapon part 1; How and why composite sticks conquered hockey

RBK 9K stick

Unless you playing days ended before the Great One skated his last lap around the ice then you know buying a hockey stick is no longer a simple process. With traditional wood sticks all but forgotten at the upper levels of the game we are officially in the composite stick age. With prices about to max out at around $250 for the highly anticipated RBK 9K sticks, not skates, have become the most expensive part of the game. So, how did we get here and what should you consider when purchasing a composite hockey stick? This week I'll talk about the genesis and then we'll talk about the good, the bad, and the ugly of purchasing a composite stick.

So, how did wood sticks end up becoming nearly extinct? Well, there are a few reasons including but not limited to the price of lumber. The average performance wood stick had jumped to over $20 and most closer to $30. Mostly it was an issue of consistency that led the revolution. The limitation of wood sticks at the highest level was you couldn't control such variables as knots, dryness, and general quality of the raw ingredients from one stick to another. Another issue became players needing a stiffer flex often had to suffer through a stick that was heavier then desired. The first step towards composite was aluminum. If you played any time from the 80's to mid 90's you likely remember the aluminum shaft. This was great in that is was much lighter and consistent...well, unless it bent. Which they did. A lot. Trying to shoot straight with a bent stick is never a great idea. The next step was the composite shaft. The earliest versions were made through a process call pultrusion mostly used in the manufacture of boat masts. While this solved the problem of bowing and bending they had no play and were heavy. To me the stick that really changed the game was the Easton Z-Bubble shaft. The Z-Bubble incorporated a lot of golf club technology into the design figuring the swing of a club and a stick were pretty similar. What made this different was the taper at the bottom of the shaft. THIS was revolutionary. This created what was know as a focus flex region or, basically stated, an area of the stick that flexed back further and easier then the rest of the shaft keeping the head or blade behind the hands longer as well as explosive follow through. It was almost perfect except they had to deal within the boundaries of replacement blades with a square peg so they couldn't mess with the geometry of the shaft itself too much (I know someone will mention the T-Flex shaft and blades which were really the true next step to the full composite stick but as it was generally considered a failure we'll just skip over it). But change was just around the corner.

The full composite stick was the unicorn of the hockey world for several years. A lot of people will lay claim to the first full composite stick (my earliest recollection was a company called Busch which partnered up with everyone from Sherwood to Itech to get their product out there) but the hockey world simply wasn't ready for a $200 stick. So, it was Easton, the leader in composite shafts and blades that finally broke through and quite by accident if you believe the stories. Stuck with the problem of showing around a prototype of a 1-piece composite stick that would retail at $150, taking pre-orders, then not being able to produce the stick for a price that would make this price a reality. So, they went back to what was one of their biggest failures...yup, the T-Flex (see, you knew I mentioned it before for a reason). The end result was what has become known as a fused 1-piece stick. Basically taking a composite shaft with an ultra-long taper ending in an extremely narrow opening inserting a composite blade with a much shorter, much narrower peg and permanently bonding them together. Yes, this was the birth of the original Synergy. Now, to say it was an overnight success would be lying as sticker shock was still in affect. However, with improved looks, increased usage at the highest levels, and tremendous positive feedback, the revolution had truly begun.

Today there are hundreds of composite sticks on the market claiming different manufacturing processes, lightest weight, most durable etc. Several companies have even perfected the "true 1-piece" stick (not fused). But, nearly a decade later, the "mistake" Easton made in it's latest incarnation as the Synergy Elite remains the most popular and best known composite stick in hockey

3 comments:

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
BigDog said...

That's a pretty good consensus of the 1-piece development. A few clarifications I think are possible:

I was raised on solid & laminated wood sticks with or without fiberglass re-enforcemen (KOHO was king for us). Fiberglass-wrapped wood blades had allowed us to custom-curve blades as needed (risking a brittle blade, but worth it for "just" the right curve), which is a lost art in composite blade times.

1) In 1993 I read an ad from "La Fountain" based in California (in the Hockey News I believe) for a carbon graphite shaft. This was arguably THE real first composite shaft and it was a complete ROCKET of a shaft.

When Easton silver and gold aluminum shafts were all the rage with the NHL - and by extension us amateurs - La Fountain was making inroads in mostly Midgets/Bantams and other amature circles. Carbon Fiber was still "under-review" by several leagues, including the NHL, for fear of the clean up after a graphite "brooming" (they don't "break" so much as "broom" apart).

The La Fountain shaft I had was the only one in my city leagues, and even at provincials and inter-provincial play we never saw another one on the ice. Contrary to this article's opinion, and in opposition to modern composite shafts or 1-pieces, it had A LOT of energy. The whip involved required adjusting slap, snap, and wrist shots a fair bit. Follow-throughs had to be lower, and stick handling was much faster than heavier wood and aluminum shafts with the sacrifice of some additional shaft flex during puck handling you had to be aware of. As you can imagine, this amount of flex made it a rocket, but also easily broken.

Modern composites are more durable than that first shaft, and don't show nearly as much "stick handling flex" as my first La Fountain did, but it's still noticeable to a Junior/college player who played with wood until Bantam.

I would NEVER suggest a carbon-fiber stick for any beginners, children under 10, or goalies.

The increased flex may help with a slightly faster shot (~5mph) than wood, but the weight loss is DETRIMENTAL to learners who NEED to have a heavier stick which will deaden a puck hitting it, instead of bouncing off (ESPECIALLY while playing defense).

I personally use a "economy" 1-piece with regular or light flex. The cheaper models are frequently more durable, a few dozen grams heavier, and still show gains over wood. Going for more expensive models bring with it 2 things you MUST consider:

1) They are usually LIGHTER, which means the puck will push the stick around more (instead of the other way around).. it's called moment of inertia and it's just a physical fact. If a 6 oz puck hits a 300g stick instead of a 2500g wood stick you WILL have more stick movement and shaft flex (unless you have a habit of holding sticks by the blade :)).

2) Lighter sticks mean less resin, and usually less fiber, sometimes though smart design, other times by using weak foam to replace solid resin/fiber. The increased flexing, over even LESS material, means higher stress on the stick... the lighter the stick, the shorter the life span.

The weight gains from a 2# wood stick over a 450g composite is HUGE... but the gains of a 300g "elite" $200 stick over that same 450g stick is minimal... and even worse the cost of ownership skyrockets.

IF you decide you a) have enough stick handling and shot technique to warrant a composite stick (Tier I hockey), and b) you can afford the cost of high end models... make sure you buy at LEAST 3 at a time. I'd NEVER take less than 2 to the bench on any game, but if 1 should break during a tournament or even during a season, you will need to have a second stick with the same CURVE and MODEL to keep your game consistent. This applies to any stick really, but in composites that come in so many models, flexes and curves, and their inabilty to adjust a curve with a torch, you could be stick with 1 game stick and a backup that is completely different.



I honestly can't help but roll my eyes when watching 6 year olds or beginner adults with super flexy composite sticks costing $200 knowing full well the extra flex/vibrations are sacrificing their puck handling abilities. Frequently, these are the same kids/adults who layer up WAY too much weight in oversized shoulder pads, shorts, shin pads, or even skates. Spend the $200 you'll save on ultra-light skates and use wood sticks... you'll develop and play much better.

Mary said...

Very nice and interesting blog,well A hockey stick is a main part of gear used in field of ice hockey, hockey, or roller hockey to transfer the ball or puck. You could get more information through this website.
http://www.icehockeydirect.com/